Flying in a plane is not only safer than driving a car, it’s also better for the environment, says a University of Michigan researcher.
He examined recent trends in energy intensity—the amount of energy needed to transport a person a given distance—in light-duty vehicles (cars, SUVs, pickups and vans) versus domestic airline flights. His analysis measured BTU per person mile from 1970 to 2012.
Sivak found that the energy intensity of driving is 2.07 times that of flying. In 2012, BTU per person mile was 4,211 for driving compared to 2,033 for flying. Consequently, the entire fleet of light-duty vehicles would have to improve from the current on-road fuel economy of 21.6 mpg to 44.7 mpg for driving to be as energy intensive as flying.
“Although the fuel economy of new vehicles is continuously improving, and these improvements are likely to accelerate given the recent update to the corporate average fuel economy standards, changes in fuel economy of new vehicles take a long time to substantially influence the fuel economy of the entire fleet,” said Sivak, a research professor at UMTRI and director of Sustainable Worldwide Transportation, a research consortium that addresses major road transportation issues worldwide.
For example, he says, the 16.5 million light vehicles sold in 2014 accounted for only about 7 percent of the entire fleet of light-duty vehicles on the road.
“It is important to recognize that the energy intensity of flying will also continue to improve,” Sivak said. “Consequently, because the future energy intensity of flying will be better than it currently is, the calculated improvements underestimate the improvements that need to be achieved in order for driving to be as energy as flying.”
Last year, Sivak issued a report that compared energy intensities of flying and driving from 1970 to 2010. The current study not only extends the analysis through 2012, but fuel calculations for flying exclude fuel needed to transport paid freight and mail on passenger carriers and on all-cargo carriers